Google Search

Showing posts with label getting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label getting. Show all posts

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Facebook users worldwide (minus some mobile phones) now getting secure web browsing by default

Over 170,000 people are part of the Sophos community on Facebook. Why not join us on Facebook to find out about the latest security threats.

Hi fellow Twitter user! Follow our team of security experts on Twitter for the latest news about internet security threats.

Already using Google+? Find us on Google+ for the latest security news.

Facebook initially introduced full-time HTTPS (secure HTTP) as an option in January 2011.

Before that, the site protected your password during login using HTTPS, but left the rest of your session unencrypted.

The change came about because, back in October 2010, a Firefox plugin called Firesheep was released as a proof of concept that sniffing an unencrypted session after login was all an attacker needed to hijack your account.

This made Facebook's new option welcome, but being opt-in meant it really didn't go far enough.

So, in an open letter in April 2011, Naked Security asked Facebook to improve privacy and safety by turning on HTTPS for everything.

In November 2012, Facebook finally did move to make secure browsing a default, at least for users in North America.

And on Wednesday, Facebook announced that it is now using HTTPS by default for all users, so the rest of the world has finally caught up. (Well, almost. Some mobile phones and carriers don't fully support HTTPS.)

Why did it take so long?

Because it involved a lot of moving parts, explains Facebook software engineer Scott Renfro.

Namely, it involved getting third-party application developers to upgrade, getting web-browser cookies to be compliant, controlling referrer headers, and migrating users to HTTPS without disrupting "in-flight" sessions, i.e. upgrading people while they're actually using the site.

Performance has also been a huge challenge, Renfro says, given the extra hoops browsers have to jump through with HTTPS:

In addition to the network round trips necessary for your browser to talk to Facebook servers, https adds additional round trips for the handshake to set up the connection. A full handshake requires two additional round trips, while an abbreviated handshake requires just one additional round trip. An abbreviated handshake can only follow a successful full handshake.

Here's an example from Renfro of how that extra latency can make users with already-slow connections suffer yet more, and how Facebook has eased the pain:

If you're in Vancouver, where a round trip to Facebook's Prineville, Oregon, data center takes 20ms, then the full handshake only adds about 40ms, which probably isn't noticeable. However, if you're in Jakarta, where a round trip takes 300ms, a full handshake can add 600ms. When combined with an already slow connection, this additional latency on every request could be very noticeable and frustrating. Thankfully, we've been able to avoid this extra latency in most cases by upgrading our infrastructure and using abbreviated handshakes.

Facebook's work on secure browsing is most certainly not done, mind you: the company says it's still working with mobile phone vendors to make it happen there.

Renfro calls HTTPS by default a "dream come true" — a goal that the company's network, security, traffic, and security infrastructure teams have been working on for years.

When Facebook first rolled out HTTPS by default, Naked Security was stuck with a heap of "Dislike" t-shirts that didn't seem appropriate anymore, so the team gave them away to readers.

Sorry, I don't know of any plans to print up "Like" t-shirts over the news that HTTPS by default is finally, for the most part, a dream come true.

But, Facebook engineers, here are two big, virtual thumbs-up for the work you've done. Let's hope it works out well for the mobile outliers, as well.

Follow @LisaVaas

Follow @NakedSecurity


View the original article here

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

"Im getting paid!" - Websites hosted on WordPress hacked due to users' poor password security

Over 170,000 people are part of the Sophos community on Facebook. Why not join us on Facebook to find out about the latest security threats.

Hi fellow Twitter user! Follow our team of security experts on Twitter for the latest news about internet security threats.

Already using Google+? Find us on Google+ for the latest security news.

WordpressMillions of blogs hosted on WordPress.com can breathe a sigh of relief - although a hacker did manage to break into thousands of sites and publish a make-money-fast advert, it wasn't because of any vulnerability on the WordPress.com site itself.

Instead, it seems users had simply been careless with their password security.

The alert was initially raised by The Hacker News (THN) and Sucuri, after some blog owners received messages from WordPress.com telling them that their passwords had been reset.

One affected WordPress.com user told THN that he had discovered hackers had published a page containing a money-making advertisement (pictured below).

Hacked page on a WordPress.com website

A Google search for

site:wordpress.com "Im getting paid!"

finds evidence of thousands of sites that suddenly found they had unwittingly published "Im getting paid!" webpages.

Compromised accounts

Although some theorised that the hacker may have exploited a vulnerability on WordPress.com (which would be a very serious problem as the WordPress.com infrastructure is used by many of the world's most popular blogs and news sites), the truth seems to be rather more pedestrian.

Barry Abrahamson from Automattic (the company which runs WordPress.com) told Naked Security that there was no compromise of the WordPress.com servers, and that rather than vulnerability the most likely cause of the problem was "people sharing the same password across multiple services."

According to the firm, it spotted the problem quickly, notified affected users and reset passwords.

It's good news that the sites hosted on WordPress.com weren't hacked due to a vulnerability. After all, many blogs choose to host on WordPress.com in order to avoid the headache of managing their own security and updates on self-hosted WordPress installations.

So, remember folks - please use different passwords for different websites. If you use the same password in multiple places, it only requires your password to be stolen in one place for it to have an unpleasant impact on your other online activities.

Follow @gcluley

View the original article here