Google Search

Showing posts with label Major. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Major. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Major computer crash in SKorea; hackers suspected

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Computer networks at major South Korean banks and top TV broadcasters crashed en masse Wednesday, paralyzing bank machines across the country and prompting speculation of a cyberattack by North Korea.

Screens went blank at 2 p.m. (0500 GMT), with reports of skulls popping up on some computer screens, the state-run Korea Information Security Agency said — a strong indication that hackers planted a malicious code in South Korean systems. Some computers came back online more than 2 ½ hours later.

Police and South Korean officials couldn't immediately determine the cause. But experts said a cyberattack orchestrated by Pyongyang was likely to blame. The rivals have exchanged threats following U.N. sanctions meant to punish North Korea over its nuclear test last month.

The shutdown appeared to be more of an inconvenience than a source of panic. There were no immediate reports that bank customers' records were compromised. It also didn't affect government agencies or networks essential to the country's infrastructure, such as power plants or transportation systems.

Still, it raised worries about the overall vulnerability to attacks in South Korea, a world leader in broadband speed and mobile Internet access. Previous hacking attacks at private companies compromised millions of people's personal data. Past malware attacks also disabled access to government agency websites and destroyed files in personal computers.

The shutdown comes amid rising rhetoric and threats of attack from Pyongyang in response to U.N. punishment for its December rocket launch and February nuclear test. Washington also expanded sanctions against North Korea this month in a bid to cripple the regime's ability to develop its nuclear program.

North Korea has threatened revenge for the sanctions and for ongoing routine U.S.-South Korean military drills it considers rehearsals for invasion.

Seoul believes North Korea runs an Internet warfare unit aimed at hacking U.S. and South Korean government and military networks to gather information and disrupt service.

Seoul blames North Korean hackers for several cyberattacks in recent years. Pyongyang has either denied or ignored those charges. Hackers operating from IP addresses in China have also faced blame.

The latest network paralysis took place just days after North Korea accused South Korea and the U.S. of staging a cyberattack that shut down its websites for two days last week. Loxley Pacific, the Thailand-based Internet service provider, confirmed the outage but did not say what caused the shutdown in North Korea.

Shinhan Bank, a major South Korean lender, reported a two-hour system shutdown Wednesday, including online banking and automated teller machines. It said networks later came back online, and that banking was back to normal at branches and online. Shinhan said no customer records or accounts were compromised.

The other bank, Nonghyup, also a major lender, said its system eventually came back online. Officials didn't answer a call seeking details on the safety of customer records.

Jeju Bank said some of its branches also reported network shutdowns.

At one Starbucks in downtown Seoul, customers were asked to pay for their coffee in cash, and lines were forming outside disabled bank machines. Seoul is a largely cashless city, with many people relying on debit and credit cards to pay for goods and services.

Broadcasters KBS and MBC said their computers went down at 2 p.m., but officials said the shutdown did not affect daily TV broadcasts. Computers were still down more than three hours after the shutdown began, the news outlets said.

The YTN cable news channel also said the company's internal computer network was completely paralyzed. Footage showed workers staring at blank computer screens.

KBS employees said they watched helplessly as files stored on their computers began disappearing as the computer went into shutdown mode.

"It's got to be a hacking attack," Lim Jong-in, dean of Korea University's Graduate School of Information Security. "Such simultaneous shutdowns cannot be caused by technical glitches."

The South Korean military raised its cyberattack readiness level but saw no signs of cyberattacks on its networks, the Defense Ministry said.

No government computers were affected, officials said. President Park Geun-hye called for quick efforts to get systems back online, according to her spokeswoman, Kim Haing.

In 2011, computer security software maker McAfee Inc. said North Korea or its sympathizers likely were responsible for a cyberattack against South Korean government and banking websites earlier that year.

The analysis also said North Korea appeared to be linked to a 2009 massive computer-based attack that brought down U.S. government Internet sites.

Pyongyang denied involvement.

But the accusations from both sides show that the warfare between the foes has expanded into cyberspace.

Last week, North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency accused South Korea and the U.S. of expanding an aggressive stance against Pyongyang into cyberspace with "intensive and persistent virus attacks."

South Korea denied the allegation and the U.S. military declined to comment.

Lim said hackers in China were likely culprits in the outage in Pyongyang.

But signs Wednesday pointed to North Korea, he said.

"Hackers attack media companies usually because of a political desire to cause confusion in society," he said. "Political attacks on South Korea come from North Koreans."

Last week, North Korea's Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea warned South Korea's "reptile media" that the country was prepared to wage a "sophisticated strike" on the country.

Orchestrating the mass shutdown of the networks of major companies would take at least one to six months of planning and coordination, said Kwon Seok-chul, chief executive officer of Seoul-based cyber security firm Cuvepia Inc.

The company that provides network services for the companies that suffered outages said it did not spot signs of a cyberattack on its networks, said Lee Jung-hwan, a spokesman for LG Uplus Corp.

Lim said tracking the source of the outage would take months.

___

Associated Press writers Sam Kim and Foster Klug contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Sunday, December 30, 2012

NASA suffers major data breach over stolen laptop that wasn't encrypted

Over 170,000 people are part of the Sophos community on Facebook. Why not join us on Facebook to find out about the latest security threats.

Hi fellow Twitter user! Follow our team of security experts on Twitter for the latest news about internet security threats.

Already using Google+? Find us on Google+ for the latest security news.

NASA image, courtesy of ShutterstockIn March 2011, algorithms used to command and control the International Space Station were exposed.

In March 2012, it was the personally identifiable information (PII) of 2,300 employees and students.

In another incident, it was sensitive data on NASA's Constellation and Orion programs.

This time around, on 31 October, it was PII on an unspecified, but large, number of NASA employees and contractors.

All these instances involved the theft of unencrypted laptops from NASA. With this most recent theft, the space agency is finally doing something about these incidents, beyond the limited scope of its previous remediation efforts.

NASA announced on Tuesday that, effective immediately, the agency is jumping on the encryption fast track.

By 21 December, no NASA-issued laptops containing sensitive information will be allowed to leave a NASA facility unless whole disk encryption software is enabled or sensitive files are individually encrypted.

In a message sent agency-wide to all employees, Associate Deputy Administrator Richard J Keegan Jr. informed NASA staff that somebody or somebodies broke into a locked vehicle and stole official NASA documents on 31 October.

The laptop contained records with PII for a large number of employees, contractors and others, Keegan said.

He gave no explanation as to why the agency waited weeks to inform employees.

Rocket. Image from ShutterstockThe computer was protected only with a password and lacked whole disk encryption, which left the information accessible to thieves.

NASA is taking standard breach precautions, including contracting a data breach specialist, ID Experts, to notify those whose PII was compromised.

The agency is offering free credit and identity monitoring, recovery services in cases of identity compromise, an insurance reimbursement policy, educational materials, access to fraud resolution representatives, and a call center and website.

It's recommending that anybody affected activate these services ASAP.

NASA is also recommending that those affected be wary of suspicious phone calls, emails, and other communications from individuals claiming to be from NASA or other official sources that ask for personal information or verification of it.

NASA and ID Experts won't be contacting employees to ask for or to confirm personal information, Keegan said, so any such communication is sure to be bogus.

NASA's embrace of full-disk encryption has up until now been less than comprehensive.

After the March 2012 stolen laptop and PII exposure, the agency pledged:

...a full review of current IT security policies and practices with the goal of making changes to prevent a similar incident.

At that time, NASA promised that all laptop computers at NASA Kennedy Space Center, not just ones with PII or sensitive data, would have their hard drives encrypted by September 2012.

In retrospect, it would have been smarter to extend that initiative to all hard drives, throughout the entire agency, not just those at Kennedy.

Secure laptop, courtesy of ShutterstockBut that is, apparently, a lesson that NASA has now taken to heart and will implement with all due haste.

The new full-disk encryption applies to all laptops containing PII, International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR) data, procurement and human resources information, and other sensitive but unclassified (SBU) data.

Keegan said that NASA's Administrator and CIO have laid out the marching orders for agency CIOs to complete whole disk encryption of the maximum possible number of laptops by 21 November.

NASA plans to complete the effort by 21 December, after which no unencrypted laptop, regardless of whether it contains PII, will be allowed to leave its facilities.

In the meantime, employees working remotely or traveling have been told to use loaner laptops if their NASA-issued laptop contains unencrypted sensitive information.

On Wednesday, a security vendor (or then again, more likely, many security vendors, but only one wrote to me directly) sent out a statement on the NASA breach that said,

"OK, whole-disk encryption might be good, but is it good enough?"

It's a question worth asking. As he said, data is in fact moving to and from laptops, in emails, files, and as data traveling to and from apps and servers.

Fortunately, NASA has also declared that storage of sensitive information on smart phones or other mobile devices is now taboo.

Let's hope they also have an eye toward all the places that data propagates, whether it's in emailed attachments, on mail servers that might be in the cloud, on smartphone mail apps, on backup tapes, or in any internal or outsourced operations.

Follow @LisaVaas
Follow @NakedSecurity

NASA image, courtesy of Songquan Deng / Shutterstock.com. Secure laptop and rocket images courtesy of Shutterstock


View the original article here

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Major shift in strategy for ZeroAccess rootkit malware, as it shifts to user-mode

Over 170,000 people are part of the Sophos community on Facebook. Why not join us on Facebook to find out about the latest security threats.

Hi fellow Twitter user! Follow our team of security experts on Twitter for the latest news about internet security threats.

Artistic interpretation of computer malware. Image courtesy of ShutterstockSophosLabs has been monitoring a new strain of the infamous ZeroAccess rootkit that has been hitting the internet over the last few weeks.

ZeroAccess is a sophisticated kernel-mode rootkit that enslaves victim PCs, adding them to a peer-to-peer botnet from which they receive commands to download other malware. The rootkit has undergone several revisions since its inception but this new version represents a major shift in strategy.

All previous versions have employed a kernel-mode component on 32-bit Windows. However, under 64-bit Windows there was no kernel-mode component - ZeroAccess operated entirely in user-mode memory.

And operating entirely in user-mode is exactly the shift in strategy that this new version employs.

ZeroAccess no longer has any kernel-mode component. Instead, a DLL is loaded into services.exe and explorer.exe and all functionality is performed inside those processes.

The previous generation of ZeroAccess would maintain reboot persistence by overwriting a Windows driver. This version uses the registry to ensure it will start again at the next boot.

ZeroAccess will create two files on an infected machine, either of which can launch the Trojan:

%WINDOWS%\installer\{GUID}\n

%profile%\local settings\application data\{GUID}\n

These two files are launched through the registry by hijacking an existing COM object and by abusing the load order of user COM objects under Windows.

The first file is launched by hijacking a COM object associated with WMI. The following registry entry is changed so that the malicious ZeroAccess DLL is loaded in place of the legitimate wbemess.dll:

HKCR\CLSID\{F3130CDB-AA52-4C3A-AB32-85FFC23AF9C1}\InprocServer32

Correct value:

%systemroot%\system32\wbem\wbemess.dll

Hijacked value:

\\.\globalroot\systemroot\Installer\{e051c979-bddd-5d1f-8953-4b8c940e9b4d}\n.

The second file is launched by creating the following COM object:

HKCU\Software\Classes\clsid\{42aedc87-2188-41fd-b9a3-0c966feabec1}

This object points to the file at:

%profile%\local settings\application data\{GUID}\n

This will ensure that the DLL is loaded because a legitimate COM object exists at:

HKCR\clsid\{42aedc87-2188-41fd-b9a3-0c966feabec1}

This COM object belongs to MruPidlList which will load shell32.dll on Windows 7 and shdocvm.dll on Windows XP.

Because the COM object that ZeroAccess creates is a user object, Windows will load it before the legitimate object located in the registry under HKCR. The real benefit of this approach is that it will work under both 32 and 64-bit versions of Windows.

The peer-to-peer protocol used by the ZeroAccess botnet has also changed. Previously all communications were RC4 encrypted using a fixed key. That has now changed. The main encryption algorithm used is now much simpler, DWORD XOR is applied with a key that is adjusted on each round:

rol loop

The actual commands involved in the protocol have been slightly modified too.

The previous version would start by issuing a 'getL' command to each peer contained in its bootstrap file of peers. The command is issued over TCP and usually to one of ports 22292, 34354, 34355, 21810.

The remote machine would then respond with a 'retL' command that contained its own list of peers and a listing of files that the bot has downloaded. The new bot would then check the list of files and download any new files by issuing a 'getF' command. These files are signed with a 512 bit RSA key:

old filer

The new version also starts by issuing a 'getL' command. But this time the command is sent out over UDP, the port numbers being used are different and the structure of the command header has changed.

The remote peer still sends back a 'retL' command, this time over UDP and this time the file information is accompanied by a signature produced by a new 1024 bit RSA key. Now, instead of sending a 'getF' command to the remote peer to retrieve files the local peer doesn't already have, the peer simply sends the encrypted file information (filename, length and timestamp value) to the remote peer over TCP on the same port number that the UDP communication took place.

The remote peer then sends back the file encrypted with RC4 and a key derived from the file information:

new filer

This new version of ZeroAccess is being aggressively distributed through the normal mechanisms - drive by downloads, fake keygens, fake game downloads, and new samples of the old variant have all but dried up.

It's clear that the malware's authors have decided on a more unified approach to supported platforms and to change the footprint of ZeroAccess both on infected machines and on infected networks.

Artistic interpretation of computer malware. Image courtesy of ShutterstockThis is most likely due to the increased attention that this malware family has been receiving from security companies, but also as more and more people are using 64-bit machines it makes sense for malware authors to focus on that platform, so maintaining a complicated kernel-mode component that only works on 32-bit systems seems less and less cost effective.

The goal of ZeroAccess remains the same: to download further malware onto the infected machine. The types of malware we are seeing downloaded are broadly the same: click fraud and spam bots, although a BitCoin miner has now been added to the mix.

SophosLabs will continue to monitor this threat and protect our customers. For more background information on ZeroAccess, be sure to read the technical paper we published earlier this year.

Follow @SophosLabs

Laptop with red bacteria image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Be the first to like this post.

View the original article here