Google Search

Showing posts with label Likes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Likes. Show all posts

Monday, December 9, 2013

Who likes porn sites better than Facebook or Twitter?

Over 170,000 people are part of the Sophos community on Facebook. Why not join us on Facebook to find out about the latest security threats.

Hi fellow Twitter user! Follow our team of security experts on Twitter for the latest news about internet security threats.

Already using Google+? Find us on Google+ for the latest security news.

Adults only. Image courtesy of Shutterstock.Read into this whatever cultural generalizations you will: recent numbers show that citizens of Germany, Spain, the UK, and the US have higher appetites for porn than anybody on the planet.

The Guardian recently got an exclusive peek at metrics from SimilarWeb, a web measurement company based in Tel Aviv that tracks clicks online (rather than total traffic volume).

The numbers show that in the UK, for one, traffic to legal porn sites outpaces even that for social media sites, such as Facebook. In fact, porn makes up 8.5% of all UK traffic.

Steamy sites also get more UK traffic than those for shopping, news, email, finance, gaming, travel, and business/industry.

The UK isn't the top porn-loving place, though. That honor goes to Germany, where a whopping 12.5% of traffic heads to the X-rated.

The top porn-surfing countries and how much of their traffic went to the internet's gazillion shades of grey during June 2013:

Germany 12.5%Spain 9.6%UK 8.5%US 8.3%Worldwide average 7.7%Ireland 7.5%France 7.3%Australia 7.0%

The only destinations more popular than porn in the UK were arts and entertainment (boosted, as it is, by YouTube traffic) at 9.5% and search engines at 15.7%.

The figures don't include traffic from mobile phones which might have told a different story.

Nor do they account for illegal searches for child abuse, which, as The Guardian notes, are typically hidden away in identity-masking networks such as Tor or peer-to-peer.

Daniel Buchuk, head of brand and strategy at SimilarWeb, told The Guardian that the world's preference for porn over chatting with our friends on social media sites - as in, not just a preference for porn over one social media site, but a preference for porn over all social media sites combined - is a tad remarkable:

"Traffic on adult sites represents a huge portion of what people use the internet for, not just in the UK but around the world ... It is astonishing to see that adult sites are more popular in the UK than all social networks combined."

Mind you, people aren't just fumbling their way into porn sites by mistyping, for example, Facebook as F**kbook, he says:

"People don't just 'stumble' upon adult content. More than 8% of Google UK searches led to adult sites in the past three months."

Of course, one doesn't want to pick on the UK, particularly given that its surfing predilections aren't the most sexy, by far.

Germany's about half as much more prone to porn surfing, for example.

But thanks to David Cameron, the UK lately has itself been introspective on the topic.

Computer porn. Image courtesy of Shutterstock.Last week, the Prime Minister gave a speech in which he announced new measures to protect children and challenged the internet's tech giants to shape up and do their part.

Upcoming changes to UK law include the criminalisation of possessing online pornography depicting rape and subjecting online videos to the same rules that pertain to those sold in licensed sex shops.

Beyond that, the more contentious changes include pervasive network-level filtering of adult content as a default position for internet access throughout the UK.

Is all this fuss warranted?

Well, kind of. Porn sites are, in fact, notoriously riskier than those serving vanilla content.

When the US Pentagon last August chewed out its missile defense workers for surfing porn on the job, a spokesman noted that the sites in question were known to have had virus and malware issues.

A government cybersecurity specialist also confirmed to Bloomberg at the time that many porn sites are infected.

Criminals and foreign intelligence services plant malware on such sites in order to gain access to and harvest data from government and corporate computer networks, the specialist explained.

So yes, porn sites carry a high risk of being boobytrapped (no pun intended).

But then again, so too do religious sites.

Nowadays, you’re reportedly more likely to get infected by visiting a church website than you are when you surf porn.

When it comes to minimizing malware infection, one could argue not only for the separation of church and state, as laid out by the founders of the US, but also for the further separation of church, state, business hours and booty.

Follow @LisaVaas

Follow @NakedSecurity

Images of computer porn and adults only courtesy of Shutterstock.


View the original article here

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Facebook cracks down on fake "Likes" - Lady Gaga, Eminem and Rihanna lose out

Over 170,000 people are part of the Sophos community on Facebook. Why not join us on Facebook to find out about the latest security threats.

Hi fellow Twitter user! Follow our team of security experts on Twitter for the latest news about internet security threats.

Already using Google+? Find us on Google+ for the latest security news.

Facebook LikePassionately Liked Facebook pages have begun to see their numbers sag.

One example is the third most-Liked Facebook page, Texas HoldEm Poker, which had a weekly count that was down 275,352 as of Saturday, according to an independent page metric site, PageData.

If you drill down into pages' growth charts, you'll see that the drops began on Monday, 24 September.

Other pages that suddenly lost some warm and fuzzy include celebrity pages of Lady Gaga (down 104,125 for the past week), Eminem (-5,572) and Rihanna (-50,610).

Facebook confirmed to CNN that the slipping Likes numbers are part of a site upgrade (perhaps in response to the site's admission that it has over 83 million fake profiles?), but it wouldn't give details beyond pointing to a 31 August statement regarding improvements to site integrity systems.

The posting states that Facebook has recently increased automated efforts to remove Likes that may have been gained by means that violate Facebook Terms, including malware, compromised accounts, duped users or purchased bulk Likes.

The move shouldn't make most pages deflate too much, Facebook says:

On average, less than 1% of Likes on any given Page will be removed, providing they and their affiliates have been abiding by our terms. … While we have always had dedicated protections against each of these threats on Facebook, these improved systems have been specifically configured to identify and take action against suspicious Likes.

One source of Like inflation are networks of zombie accounts run by bot masters.

Researchers at the University of British Columbia last year created a network of some 100 Facebook bots and found it was easy to evade Facebook detection, convincing thousands of real Facebook users to friend their lifeless fabrications - particularly when they employed photos of attractive women.

Socialbot network

Another source of fake Likes is a phenomenon known as a tagging session.

A Valentine's Day page, bleating about Love and Like, adorned with red and pink hearts, is an example.

Facebook page

That Facebook page conducts frenzied, 10-minute Liking and Sharing sessions, the rules of which state that it will ban participants who don't tag 99% of the sites being promoted.

But just who, exactly, gets hurt by fake Likes? Those who are trying to accurately measure how well their marketing efforts are doing.

Jon Loomer, a social media consultant, is one of those people.

In January, he posted about being targeted by Like scams.

Loomer happily watched his Likes grow, only to find that much of it came from tagging-session participants who didn't have a clue who he was or what his page was for.

As such, he was left in the dark regarding what real relationships he'd managed to form:

An inflated number is not reality. It doesn’t give me an accurate reflection of how I’m doing. So if I’m doing poorly, I want the numbers to reflect that. I don’t want a lie that will deflect the truth.

Regardless of what Facebook does to weed out fake Likes, the black market will evolve. We'll continue to see bots that add friends, spam messages and Like pages.

But people who buy into these offers for bogus page promotion, such as "500 Likes for $5!", will get what they paid for: junk.

They'll get 80% bots and 20% people who've been spammed to death, notes Quora submitter Massimo Chieruzzi.

And as Loomer points out, some perfectly well-meaning people may well participate in tagging sessions:

They are struggling. They don’t want to spend the money on ads. Maybe they simply don’t know how to build a page honestly. Or they think this will lead to wealth.

But fake Likes are just smoke. They won't help struggling businesses grow in any real sense.

So kudos to Facebook for popping the bubble, even if it's only a temporary stop-gap before the black market evolves and finds more ways to rig the system.

If you're on Facebook, and want to learn more about security and privacy issues on the social network, consider joining the Naked Security Facebook page.

Follow @LisaVaas
Follow @NakedSecurity


View the original article here